A Common Sense Response to Left Wing Stupidity: How did America-Hating Left-Wingers Take Over the Internet?
As the title suggests, I am going to use common sense to battle the Left. This is normally pretty simple. I’ll try to be brief in case supporters of the Left manage to accidentally find their way here and spend a moment reading this blog.
I happened across this article: The Rise of the New Confederacy: How America-Hating Right-Wingers Took Over the GOP
The article decided to prove that people such as Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and Rick Perry all hate America because they are religious.
Yes, I’m serious.
The article starts out with a quick history of secular higher education after the Civil War. This leads into how more Conservative Christians objected to the more modern education and decided to create things like Bob Jones University. I won’t try to defend Bob Jones at all as it has little to do with the overall objective of the article. I’m not here in defense of religion today. I’m here to defend common sense which is often times under attack.
The author goes on to give a name to a kind of disorder that afflicts people who follow a certain religious philosophy, premillennial dispensationalism (p.d.). Again, not here to give a crap about this guys opinions on religious people or to defend the religious people. But let’s just say that the author has a low opinion of those who have this philosophy. I would suggest going to the article and reading how he defines this philosophy as I won’t be reliving all the details here.
Where this guy goes off the deep end, is when he tries to connect this religious philosophy with Right Wing political beliefs, and does so badly.
Skeptics regarding p.d.’s influence rightly note that a relatively small minority of the population actually adhere to the theology. But unified and highly galvanized groups wield outsized power in American politics. The hard work of actually getting things done, whether for good or ill, depends on the energy and organization of “marginal” groups who represent minority opinions and which, more often than not, are fired by religious faith. That truth has been driven home with frightening clarity by the recent debt-ceiling debate and by the radicalism of the leading Republican presidential candidates–nearly all of whom, not coincidentally, profess faith in some variation of p.d. theology.
Did you catch that? If you are a crazy religious nut, you also believe that the enormous federal debt is a bad thing. Only the crazy, stupid, non-scientific, religious people are of the opinion that we are spending too much in this country.
Pragmatists and progressives defer to experts and professionals. They expect truth claims to be supported by evidence that emerges from research and testing. They put their faith in this process, and in the communities of inquiry–the disciplines–legitimized by secular institutions of higher education.
The new Confederacy rejects that process wholesale. Its leaders and authorities are the spiritual descendants of the conservative Christians and charismatic radio preachers who broke away from religious modernism in the 1920s and 1930s. For these leaders and their followers, faith justifies–and verifies–itself. You don’t believe an idea because it’s true. It’s true because you believe it.
This is why, in the “real America” of Bachmann, Palin and Perry, it is self-evident that cutting taxes increases revenues; the founders were evangelical Christians; evolution is bunk; climate change is a hoax; the United States has the best healthcare system in the world; we can transform the Middle East into a garden of democracy; Kenya native Barack Obama has slashed the military budget; the war on drugs is worth the cost; and so on. These are all leaps of faith. The new Confederates flat-out reject or ignore any counter-evidence, because they have their own fount of truth. FOX News is the obvious example, but decades before the rise of FOX–going back to the early 20th century radio evangelists–conservatives had been quietly building their own media and networks for “truth” telling.
So only the crazy religious people believe that cutting taxes helps to generate higher revenues and they believe this without any actual evidence. The author knows this because he is a progressive, and as he explained, progressives defer to experts and expect claims to be supported by evidence from research and testing.
This of course would be completely relevant, if it were even slightly true.
Most Conservative opinion has little to do with religion. It is an opinion derived from economic theory, and this little thing called empirical evidence. I assume that the author of this article pays no attention to tax revenues generated after the tax reform of the 80s. I also assume that the author has never read the research paper written by Cristine Romer, former economic adviser to President Obama. A research paper written by the Romer family (her husband helped) shows that historically, higher tax rates have a negative impact on Gross Domestic Product.
But pay no mind to all of this. Only pay attention to the simple fact that if you believe in lower tax rates, you are a lunatic religious person who doesn’t believe in evidence. That is the opinion of the author.
Also pay no attention to the thousands of actual scientists who are global warming skeptics.
Pay no attention to the people who come into the US to take advantage of our healthcare system, and pay no attention to the fact that other countries take advantage of scientific research done in the US when they provide healthcare to their citizens, and then pay no attention to the fact that those countries still fail to deliver healthcare.
Pay no attention to the fact that private consumption has a larger multiplier effect than government spending.
Only pay attention to the fact that if you believe in these things, you are a CRAZY PERSON!!!!
The author does what so many on the Left attempt to do every day. He attempts to take a few ideas that are common sense, and tie those ideas to a philosophy that can be rejected in an attempt to derail the common sense ideas.
The first problem is that the philosophies are in fact not tied together. Small government, lower spending, lower taxation, and other Conservative philosophies are in fact not tied to the religious philosophy that the author obviously hates. The Founding Fathers had religious influence when they created this country, but they were also influenced by the evils of a large government and it’s ability to tax it’s citizens and act in a tyrannical fashion. The Declaration mentions that we all have rights because of our Creator, but does not give a name to that Creator. The Constitution then goes on to prevent the government from making any religion the law of the land.
Many economists, libertarians, and people who don’t go to Church every Sunday happen to agree with the Founding Father’s philosophy of small, non-tyrannical government.
The second problem is all of the previously listed flaws in the authors own beliefs. He quickly brushes over lower taxes, the debt ceiling, global warming, etc, etc, etc. He claims that those who disagree with him reject the process of “evidence that emerges from research and testing.”
This of course could not be further from the truth. Scientists cannot agree on global warming, and we now know that those who are studying global warming were fudging the data so that they could continue to get their tax payer funded research grants. Economic research and plenty of evidence demonstrates that our progressive tax policy is a detriment to our economy. Economic research demonstrates that taxing business and investment is driving business and investment to other countries. And if I need to explain the problems created by continuing to increase our debt, please just leave. By the way, why didn’t he mention Obama’s previous objection to raising the debt ceiling? Is Barack Hussein Obama a crazy religious nut too?
The third issue with the article is kind of an extension of the first one, trying to tie things together that don’t actually fit. To help get my point across, I will post the title of the article again, “The Rise of the New Confederacy: How America-Hating Right-Wingers Took Over the GOP.”
A few times in the article, the author refers to this make believe enemy as “the Confederacy.” This isn’t done by accident. It is a deliberate attempt at the incredibly tired calls of racism. I know, I know, you guys were thinking that the fraudulent use of the race card was going out of style. But it is still very much in style. It is kind of like the Kardashians. Everyone thinks it’s stupid, but it won’t go away. But the use of the word “Confederacy” actually goes past racism and leaps right into slavery. So if you believe in things like low tax rates, you believe in slavery, according to the author. The best part about this is of course the fact that high taxation is nothing more than slavery.
Another issue with the article. STOP TELLING ME THAT I LOVE FOX NEWS. That is actually worse than the race card in my book. The Left brings up Fox News almost every time they are saying something stupid. Just a fact. When the Left has something stupid to say about the Right, they tell us how much we love Fox News and cling to every word of Glenn Beck. Due to the fact that my IQ is higher than 2, I’m getting fucking sick and tired of this incredible act of stupidity. If you can’t make a point without trying to bringing up Fox News, do everyone on the planet a favor. Go kill yourself. You are too stupid to continue living. Thanks much. That may seem like a bit much to many people, but it’s a pet peeve of mine, probably because I don’t watch Fox News and haven’t seen Glenn Beck in forever. I know Beck isn’t mentioned in the article, but he normally is. OK, got that out of my system now.
To recap, the author tries to tell you that you are stupid if you don’t believe what he believes even though what he believes has been proven to be wrong. He tells you that you don’t believe in research and evidence, while he ignores research and evidence. He tries, very badly, to combine what he contends is a new religious influence to economic policy. And at the same time, not only does he call you stupid if you believe in low tax rates, he also compares you to the Confederacy so that he can attempt to tie you to slavery. And he says something stupid about Fox News because he is fucking stupid.
So I have some advice for Mr. Theo Anderson. If you are going to try and attack religion and political philosophy all at the same time, try to get your facts straight. Get past the incredibly tired race card bullshit. And try to get over Fox News, which is a 24 hour news channel you have never in your life seen.
I just realized that this article is a bit longer than I originally anticipated, so I am guessing that Theo and any other American hating Left-Wingers stopped reading long ago and are enthralled with OWS, Ed Schultz, and the Kardashians.