<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Proof that what I Said about Ron Paul Conspiracy Nuts it True.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/</link>
	<description>News and Views brought to you by The New Pundit's favorite blogs. Bookmark this site to get Daily Updates on the War on Terror and Political Corruption.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thenewpundit</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>thenewpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>I just looked at the site of digg bans. They are all Ron Paul sites. That&#039;s too funny. 

&quot;WE DON&#039;T SPAM!!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked at the site of digg bans. They are all Ron Paul sites. That&#8217;s too funny. </p>
<p>&#8220;WE DON&#8217;T SPAM!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldGuy</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>OldGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Alex Jones supports Ron Paul.&lt;/i&gt;

Yup we&#039;ve discussed that at my forum.

&lt;i&gt;Did you notice that Sam again called us names while claiming that he doesn’t call people names?&lt;/i&gt;

Well sure...we don&#039;t agree with him so that is the standard tactic, the troooothers do it too.

Everything the rontards do is predictable because the trooothers have done it first, well and also because RP supporters are mostly troooothers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Alex Jones supports Ron Paul.</i></p>
<p>Yup we&#8217;ve discussed that at my forum.</p>
<p><i>Did you notice that Sam again called us names while claiming that he doesn’t call people names?</i></p>
<p>Well sure&#8230;we don&#8217;t agree with him so that is the standard tactic, the troooothers do it too.</p>
<p>Everything the rontards do is predictable because the trooothers have done it first, well and also because RP supporters are mostly troooothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thenewpundit</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>thenewpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>OldGuy. The use of 911 tactics by the Ron Paul crowd is not a surprise. Alex Jones supports Ron Paul. Did you notice that Sam again called us names while claiming that he doesn&#039;t call people names? 

I guess he continues to miss the fact that so many Ron Paul fans have called me things like Nazi simply for calling them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OldGuy. The use of 911 tactics by the Ron Paul crowd is not a surprise. Alex Jones supports Ron Paul. Did you notice that Sam again called us names while claiming that he doesn&#8217;t call people names? </p>
<p>I guess he continues to miss the fact that so many Ron Paul fans have called me things like Nazi simply for calling them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldGuy</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>OldGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The next test I will run will be to add the name Ron Paul to an article 2 or 3 days later, just so that it pops up when they do their searches. Then I can track to see how many hits it gets after I add it.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually it&#039;s already been done.
There was a while on Digg that a few guys just added RP&#039;s name to every article they Dugg just to see what would happen.
Like &quot;Sun Flowers are so Cool (Ron Paul)&quot; and then they&#039;d watch those hits climb.
Multiple individuals have been banned from Digg because of their violation of the TOS.
Here&#039;s a link to an article:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ryanunderdown.com/2007/05/21/10-political-sites-that-violate-diggs-tos/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10 Political Sites That Violate Digg’s TOS&lt;/a&gt;

The RuPaul supporters are actually using a tactic that 911 trooothers have been using for a while, and users who do so routinely get banned for the practice. For an example see this thread at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://prisonplanet.tv/forum/index.php?topic=3092.0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prison Planet Forum&lt;/a&gt;.

Just the fact that anyone who bloggs about RP gets very few normal people comments should be proof enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The next test I will run will be to add the name Ron Paul to an article 2 or 3 days later, just so that it pops up when they do their searches. Then I can track to see how many hits it gets after I add it.</i></p>
<p>Actually it&#8217;s already been done.<br />
There was a while on Digg that a few guys just added RP&#8217;s name to every article they Dugg just to see what would happen.<br />
Like &#8220;Sun Flowers are so Cool (Ron Paul)&#8221; and then they&#8217;d watch those hits climb.<br />
Multiple individuals have been banned from Digg because of their violation of the TOS.<br />
Here&#8217;s a link to an article:<br />
<a href="http://ryanunderdown.com/2007/05/21/10-political-sites-that-violate-diggs-tos/" rel="nofollow">10 Political Sites That Violate Digg’s TOS</a></p>
<p>The RuPaul supporters are actually using a tactic that 911 trooothers have been using for a while, and users who do so routinely get banned for the practice. For an example see this thread at the <a href="http://prisonplanet.tv/forum/index.php?topic=3092.0" rel="nofollow">Prison Planet Forum</a>.</p>
<p>Just the fact that anyone who bloggs about RP gets very few normal people comments should be proof enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>The reason you get traffic when you mention Ron Paul, is because PEOPLE WANT TO READ ABOUT HIM! DUH!

Then they come here and see your incessantly lunatic ramblings and they&#039;re pissed because you&#039;ve wasted their time and because you usually spread nothing but the same old rehashed neoconservative line bullshit and lies because YOU&#039;RE TRYING TO PISS THEM OFF!

Jesus, you guys need to take a serious look at reality. But I hope you keep it up though, because it gives me a small and enjoyable distraction from my work when I need one and because...THERE&#039;S NO SUCH THING AS BAD PUBLICITY.

You can&#039;t hurt Ron Paul on this blog because there is NOTHING in his record that you can hold against him. There is NOTHING in his personal life that you can hold against him. You may be able to point out some of his votes that YOU personally didn&#039;t like, but it all goes back to following the Constitution. All you&#039;re doing is introducing more and more neoconservatives to a true conservative.

Let me guess, you guys don&#039;t like Dr. Paul because of his stance on things like the war and the Patriot Act. You don&#039;t wan&#039;t either of those things to end. You want to keep attacking other countries PRE-EMPTIVELY and you want the government to keep spying on its own citizens.

Boys, you are not conservatives. I know you think you are, but you&#039;re not. You&#039;re just some of those whacky, goony, loony neocons who think they&#039;re conservatives, even though they&#039;re following LEFTIST policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason you get traffic when you mention Ron Paul, is because PEOPLE WANT TO READ ABOUT HIM! DUH!</p>
<p>Then they come here and see your incessantly lunatic ramblings and they&#8217;re pissed because you&#8217;ve wasted their time and because you usually spread nothing but the same old rehashed neoconservative line bullshit and lies because YOU&#8217;RE TRYING TO PISS THEM OFF!</p>
<p>Jesus, you guys need to take a serious look at reality. But I hope you keep it up though, because it gives me a small and enjoyable distraction from my work when I need one and because&#8230;THERE&#8217;S NO SUCH THING AS BAD PUBLICITY.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t hurt Ron Paul on this blog because there is NOTHING in his record that you can hold against him. There is NOTHING in his personal life that you can hold against him. You may be able to point out some of his votes that YOU personally didn&#8217;t like, but it all goes back to following the Constitution. All you&#8217;re doing is introducing more and more neoconservatives to a true conservative.</p>
<p>Let me guess, you guys don&#8217;t like Dr. Paul because of his stance on things like the war and the Patriot Act. You don&#8217;t wan&#8217;t either of those things to end. You want to keep attacking other countries PRE-EMPTIVELY and you want the government to keep spying on its own citizens.</p>
<p>Boys, you are not conservatives. I know you think you are, but you&#8217;re not. You&#8217;re just some of those whacky, goony, loony neocons who think they&#8217;re conservatives, even though they&#8217;re following LEFTIST policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>You have got to be kidding? You can&#039;t actually believe the words you write! I have been nothing but polite for the last week, going OVER AND ABOVE the call of duty to be nice to you loons, while you all have called me and other Ron Paul&#039;s supporters every name in the book, and when I do the same, to show you how ridiculous it is, I prove YOUR point? LOL

You people DO live in an alternate universe! :)

So, why don&#039;t you all tell the world who YOU&#039;RE supporting? Whoever it is, I&#039;ll bet he&#039;s just like Bush.

The only reason no one comments on your other articles, is because no one READS them. That&#039;s why you constantly drone on about Ron Paul...it gets you traffic. You sad little group of jaggof Fredtards! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have got to be kidding? You can&#8217;t actually believe the words you write! I have been nothing but polite for the last week, going OVER AND ABOVE the call of duty to be nice to you loons, while you all have called me and other Ron Paul&#8217;s supporters every name in the book, and when I do the same, to show you how ridiculous it is, I prove YOUR point? LOL</p>
<p>You people DO live in an alternate universe! <img src='http://thenewpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, why don&#8217;t you all tell the world who YOU&#8217;RE supporting? Whoever it is, I&#8217;ll bet he&#8217;s just like Bush.</p>
<p>The only reason no one comments on your other articles, is because no one READS them. That&#8217;s why you constantly drone on about Ron Paul&#8230;it gets you traffic. You sad little group of jaggof Fredtards! <img src='http://thenewpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thenewpundit</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>thenewpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>The next test I will run will be to add the name Ron Paul to an article 2 or 3 days later, just so that it pops up when they do their searches. Then I can track to see how many hits it gets after I add it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next test I will run will be to add the name Ron Paul to an article 2 or 3 days later, just so that it pops up when they do their searches. Then I can track to see how many hits it gets after I add it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldGuy</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>OldGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Oh, that’s right, you don’t comment because I didn’t mention Ron Paul’s name in the piece.
&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s really the entire point, and they miss it every time it&#039;s pointed out.
In order for them to be remotely interested it has to have &quot;Ron Paul&quot; in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh, that’s right, you don’t comment because I didn’t mention Ron Paul’s name in the piece.<br />
</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s really the entire point, and they miss it every time it&#8217;s pointed out.<br />
In order for them to be remotely interested it has to have &#8220;Ron Paul&#8221; in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thenewpundit</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>thenewpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Sam, I have said it a thousand times. Thank you for proving my point. I, the Great One, gave you the chance to have a rational discussion. Since that is impossible for you, you went right back on the attack. 
Thank you so much.
I also notice that I received no response from you or any of your spambuddies on the little piece I put together on the Constitution. I thought Ron Paul was the Constitutional God of the World. Why no comment on anything I right that defends a Ron Paul philosophy? Oh, that&#039;s right, you don&#039;t comment because I didn&#039;t mention Ron Paul&#039;s name in the piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, I have said it a thousand times. Thank you for proving my point. I, the Great One, gave you the chance to have a rational discussion. Since that is impossible for you, you went right back on the attack.<br />
Thank you so much.<br />
I also notice that I received no response from you or any of your spambuddies on the little piece I put together on the Constitution. I thought Ron Paul was the Constitutional God of the World. Why no comment on anything I right that defends a Ron Paul philosophy? Oh, that&#8217;s right, you don&#8217;t comment because I didn&#8217;t mention Ron Paul&#8217;s name in the piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewpundit.com/2007/08/14/more-proof-that-what-i-said-about-ron-paul-conspiracy-nuts-it-true/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong Bushbot? Nothing to say? :)

Oh God, you&#039;re not gonna start crying are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong Bushbot? Nothing to say? <img src='http://thenewpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Oh God, you&#8217;re not gonna start crying are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

