More Proof that what I Said about Ron Paul Conspiracy Nuts it True.
From some nuthouse called Blacklistednews.com
As we reported on July 15, Ron Paul’s supporters were concerned that Diebold touch-screen voting machines were going to be used in the Iowa Republican Straw Poll. Well, it turns out the concerns about touch-screens were misplaced, as the GOP chose paper-based Diebold optical-scan machines instead. But their fears of Diebold may well have been justified as two of their op-scan systems failed and delayed the reported results.
It goes on to tell of the Diebold conspiracy. I said this would happen. It will happen again when Ron Paul gets his butt kicked in the primaries.
I found more conspiracy nutjobs:
And of course, you can just Google “Ron Paul Diebold” to see it unfold.
- August 14th
The controversy over Diebold voting machines predates Ron Paul.
An HBO documentary on the subject with Bev Harris:
http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/
(you can probably watch it free online @ youtube or googlevideo)
Bev also has this website that investigtes voting machine irregularities and educates election officials since Diebold has a history of lying.
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
—–
A KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst cut his rating on Diebold Inc…
Matt J. Summerville, in a client note, cut the stock to “Hold” from “Buy,” noting likely issues in the company’s election systems business due to potential legislation. [-that will outlaw touchscreen machines, and force machine software code to be disclosed for independent security certification.]
—–
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/13/ap4012936.html
If this were just some hair-brained conspiracy, would lawmakers and Wall Street even acknowledge it?
If you acted like an adult and simply said they had challenges, then people could talk to you. But your tinfoil theory is that Ron Paul is the only one being affected by the system. That’s a conspiracy.
Unreliable vote counting affects us all. It’s sad when Sierra Leone has less chance of faulty vote counting than we do. They have a paper ballot and a finger dipped in ink so they can’t vote more than once.
I do have a question about the Iowa vote. If 24,000+ voting tickets were sold, how come there were only 14,000+ votes?
Signed, an independent American voter
Some people say that it’s the Ron Paul folks that have been analyzing the diebold weaknesses are going to use it to their advantage and hack the elections next year.
The point is, if anyone can “hack” a voting machine it’s bad for the country. What if those lost or misdirected votes were for the candidate you are supporting?
You can call everyone names, nutjobs, conspiracy theorists etc…but the fact is voter fraud is real and should be looked at critically.
Once again, I would like to thank you all for helping me prove my point.
And what point would that be? That electronic voting machines are susceptible to problems? Not that I care because Hillary is going to work it all out for us.
Romney’s supporters didn’t sue, neither did Huckabee’s or anyone else.
The only ones who did were Ron Paul supporters.
The only question is why?
Most people believe that those who support RP are tinhat paranoids and RP doesn’t have a chance in hell to be elected president.
The only reason they challenge each and every poll, blog or anything else is to be able to claim later that Ron Paul won but was denied the presidency because of the various conspiracies they believe in.
The author predicted it and it came true, no other candidates supporters were concerned about it.
Give it up….game, set, match.
“Romney’s supporters didn’t sue, neither did Huckabee’s or anyone else.
The only ones who did were Ron Paul supporters.
The only question is why?”
Maybe Ron Paul’s supporters are smarter and more informed than Romney’s or Huckabee’s supporters. At least they’re AWARE of the problems with the Diebold machines.
It’s been all over the news since 2004 and Princeton, MIT and Caltech have all proved the vulnerabilities of these machines and the ease of jacking an election. Apparently Ron Paul’s supporters are paying attention.
Apparently Ron Paul’s supporters are paying attention.
More like more obsessed and paranoid.
thenewpundit:
“Once again, I would like to thank you all for helping me prove my point.”
Folks, you can’t win with this guy. If you respond in ANY way to ANY article he writes about Ron Paul, no matter how logical and amiable your response, you’re somehow magically transformed into a Rontard conspiracy nut. It’s called linear thinking or a ‘one dimensional thought process’.
OldGuy,
I would explain your behavior here to be that as well. People who live in glass houses…
Well lets analyze “logical and amiable” shall we?
The author predicted there would be outcry’s of “conspiracy” if RuPaul didn’t win the straw poll, not that the entire process is rigged, only towards RuPaul because he’s the only one who can “save the universe”.
He didn’t win so the only explanation is that it was rigged because it couldn’t possibly be that he doesn’t have popular support.
He tanked and the rontards came crawling out of their dark corners yelling “conspiracy”.
He was right….surprise, surprise, and the best you got is glass houses?
Tsk,tsk.
First of all, my ‘glass houses’ remark was directed towards you, you whackjob, not the whackjob author or the article, as any reasonable person can see. It was directed at you for your ‘obsessed and paranoid’ comment. Let’s not confuse the two issues here. I know that’s a specialty of yours.
Secondly, the author must believe he lives in some alternate universe where you can say inflammitory and demeaning things to a group of people, publicly, and he then should not expect a response, but if he gets one, it then proves his point.
There is no logic there, nor is there any logic in the two of you anxiously obsessing over Ron Paul supporters. I have to wonder, why do you both obsess with the supporters and not the issues surrounding this presidential candidate, or the candidate himself? If you don’t like him as a candidate, what the hell do you care about his supporters?
Now, how do you know the entire process wasn’t rigged? How do you know Tancredo didn’t really win with Ron Paul coming in second? How do you know that YOU weren’t snowed along with all the rest of us? Short answer, you don’t! Since the Iowa GOP chose to count the votes behind closed doors with police protection, and won’t provide a paper trail to prove their count was valid, how do you know your candidate, John Cox didn’t really win? You Coxtard!
Are you THAT trusting of our new electronic election process where we simply take the word of the person who comes out and announces? I don’t even think YOU are that nutty or delusional. But I’m sure you’ll try to prove me wrong.
And for the record, Ron Paul didn’t ‘tank’ in Iowa, you Coxtard, he came in 5th which I thought was pretty good for the amount of time and money he spent there.
You really are a loon aren’t you??
First you say, “Well lets analyze “logical and amiable” shall we”? Then you go off into some illogical rant about the author, where I think you’re going to start crying, and you don’t analyze “logical and amiable” at all.
Then you throw in a couple ‘RuPaul’s’ for good measure and then criticize me because I said ‘glass houses’ like I said that to the author when you know damned well I said that to you!!
Man, you Tomtards can never make sense.
Have you idiots finally figured out how to get some attention on the web? That’s what you Coxtards are doing isn’t it??? You finally figured out how to get people to come and read your little literary dung piles by mentioning Ron Paul!!!
Ohh, that’s just a sad and pathetic cry for attention!! I finally figured you losers out!
Hehe
Just keep throwing that fit.
Get it all out now…..there there isn’t that better?
I figured you’d finally understand if I started speaking your language, you Hucktard!
You Hucker!
LMAO!!
I’ll bet your a Fredtard aren’t you? I’ll bet your just hiding back there in your stinky little hole waiting for big Fred to come out of his stinkly little hole right?
You can’t be a Hucktard, cause Huckleberry is polite, and you don’t like that. You could be a Tomtard though, you fit the profile. I bet you’d actually get the first boner you’ve had in years if ‘ol Tom nuked Mecca wouldn’t you? That would be better than viagra wouldn’t it?
One things for sure, no matter what ‘tard you are, you’re afraid to say. Sissy.
How am I doin? Am I convincing?
What’s wrong Bushbot? Nothing to say?
Oh God, you’re not gonna start crying are you?
Sam, I have said it a thousand times. Thank you for proving my point. I, the Great One, gave you the chance to have a rational discussion. Since that is impossible for you, you went right back on the attack.
Thank you so much.
I also notice that I received no response from you or any of your spambuddies on the little piece I put together on the Constitution. I thought Ron Paul was the Constitutional God of the World. Why no comment on anything I right that defends a Ron Paul philosophy? Oh, that’s right, you don’t comment because I didn’t mention Ron Paul’s name in the piece.
Oh, that’s right, you don’t comment because I didn’t mention Ron Paul’s name in the piece.
That’s really the entire point, and they miss it every time it’s pointed out.
In order for them to be remotely interested it has to have “Ron Paul” in it.
The next test I will run will be to add the name Ron Paul to an article 2 or 3 days later, just so that it pops up when they do their searches. Then I can track to see how many hits it gets after I add it.
You have got to be kidding? You can’t actually believe the words you write! I have been nothing but polite for the last week, going OVER AND ABOVE the call of duty to be nice to you loons, while you all have called me and other Ron Paul’s supporters every name in the book, and when I do the same, to show you how ridiculous it is, I prove YOUR point? LOL
You people DO live in an alternate universe!
So, why don’t you all tell the world who YOU’RE supporting? Whoever it is, I’ll bet he’s just like Bush.
The only reason no one comments on your other articles, is because no one READS them. That’s why you constantly drone on about Ron Paul…it gets you traffic. You sad little group of jaggof Fredtards!
The reason you get traffic when you mention Ron Paul, is because PEOPLE WANT TO READ ABOUT HIM! DUH!
Then they come here and see your incessantly lunatic ramblings and they’re pissed because you’ve wasted their time and because you usually spread nothing but the same old rehashed neoconservative line bullshit and lies because YOU’RE TRYING TO PISS THEM OFF!
Jesus, you guys need to take a serious look at reality. But I hope you keep it up though, because it gives me a small and enjoyable distraction from my work when I need one and because…THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS BAD PUBLICITY.
You can’t hurt Ron Paul on this blog because there is NOTHING in his record that you can hold against him. There is NOTHING in his personal life that you can hold against him. You may be able to point out some of his votes that YOU personally didn’t like, but it all goes back to following the Constitution. All you’re doing is introducing more and more neoconservatives to a true conservative.
Let me guess, you guys don’t like Dr. Paul because of his stance on things like the war and the Patriot Act. You don’t wan’t either of those things to end. You want to keep attacking other countries PRE-EMPTIVELY and you want the government to keep spying on its own citizens.
Boys, you are not conservatives. I know you think you are, but you’re not. You’re just some of those whacky, goony, loony neocons who think they’re conservatives, even though they’re following LEFTIST policies.
The next test I will run will be to add the name Ron Paul to an article 2 or 3 days later, just so that it pops up when they do their searches. Then I can track to see how many hits it gets after I add it.
Actually it’s already been done.
There was a while on Digg that a few guys just added RP’s name to every article they Dugg just to see what would happen.
Like “Sun Flowers are so Cool (Ron Paul)” and then they’d watch those hits climb.
Multiple individuals have been banned from Digg because of their violation of the TOS.
Here’s a link to an article:
10 Political Sites That Violate Digg’s TOS
The RuPaul supporters are actually using a tactic that 911 trooothers have been using for a while, and users who do so routinely get banned for the practice. For an example see this thread at the Prison Planet Forum.
Just the fact that anyone who bloggs about RP gets very few normal people comments should be proof enough.
OldGuy. The use of 911 tactics by the Ron Paul crowd is not a surprise. Alex Jones supports Ron Paul. Did you notice that Sam again called us names while claiming that he doesn’t call people names?
I guess he continues to miss the fact that so many Ron Paul fans have called me things like Nazi simply for calling them out.
Alex Jones supports Ron Paul.
Yup we’ve discussed that at my forum.
Did you notice that Sam again called us names while claiming that he doesn’t call people names?
Well sure…we don’t agree with him so that is the standard tactic, the troooothers do it too.
Everything the rontards do is predictable because the trooothers have done it first, well and also because RP supporters are mostly troooothers.
I just looked at the site of digg bans. They are all Ron Paul sites. That’s too funny.
“WE DON’T SPAM!!!”